OSINT Investigation:
Roman Semiokhin
Co-founder of 1xBet — global illegal gambling network under multi-jurisdictional sanctions and enforcement scrutiny
Primary Jurisdictions
Russia, Curaçao, Cyprus, Netherlands
Investigation Period
2018 – Present
Methodology
Open-Source Intelligence
Intelligence Metrics
60+
Sources Analyzed
Investigative journalism (FTM, Bellingcat, Sunday Times), regulatory filings, court records
1,800+
Blacklist Entries
1xBet-linked website addresses appearing on international regulatory blacklists
12+
Jurisdictions
Countries where 1xBet allegedly operates without a valid gambling licence
1,000+
Gambling Websites
Network of gambling sites linked to 1xBet's global operations
3M+
Crypto Transactions
Transactions traced across 250+ wallets linked to 1xBet
€4B+
Crypto Flows Traced
Aggregate value of transactions through 1xBet-linked wallets (FTM analysis)
Roman Semiokhin is a Russian national identified as a co-founder of 1xBet, a gambling brand whose network of 1,000+ websites, €4 billion in traced crypto flows, Ukrainian sanctions listing and Dutch Supreme Court bankruptcy of its parent entity position it as one of the most scrutinised online gambling operations globally. The brand's reach spans Russia, Curaçao, Cyprus, the Netherlands and dozens of regulated markets where independent regulators have identified it as operating without authorisation.
Identity & Corporate Network Analysis
Identity Verification
Roman Semiokhin is a Russian national publicly identified as a co-founder of 1xBet, a gambling brand originally established in Russia around 2007. Open-source reporting, including by Follow the Money and Arbusers, associates him with fellow co-founders who have reportedly relocated to Cyprus and are alleged to have obtained Cypriot citizenship via investor-residency routes.
No verified personal gambling-industry licences are documented in the public record for Semiokhin. His public footprint is primarily corporate (via 1xBet and successor entities) and social (via a reported dance festival organised in Cyprus alongside other co-founders).
Corporate Network Mapping
The core operational brand, 1xBet, was historically managed via 1xCorp N.V. — a Curaçao entity whose bankruptcy was finalised by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in January 2023 following unresolved claims from defrauded clients.
Following the bankruptcy, a successor letterbox entity, Acom Latin America NV, was reportedly registered at the same Willemstad address, enabling operational continuity of the 1xBet brand. The Curaçao master licence underpinning these operations was issued via Cyberluck, whose CEO Angelique Snel-Guttenberg is a secondary figure in the network.
Corporate Network
Entity Web — 7 Entities, 6 Relationships
Click any node to inspect · Drag to pan · Scroll to zoom · Edge colors: owns · manages · rebranded · affiliated
Beneficial Ownership & Control Analysis
Click on nodes or connection lines to reveal concealment tactics and red flags
The ownership structure combines Russian origin, Curaçao corporate domicile, Cyprus residency of the founding group and a Netherlands-identified operative footprint — a configuration that distributes control across jurisdictions with divergent enforcement incentives.
Co-founder control is exercised collectively rather than through formal nominee-director arrangements typical of pure shell operations; however, the use of a master-licensee structure in Curaçao and a same-address successor entity post-bankruptcy functionally replicates the concealment and recourse-blocking features of shell company networks.
Systemic AML red flags include €4 billion in cryptocurrency flows traced across 250+ wallets and over 3 million transactions, bankruptcy of the parent without creditor compensation, Ukrainian sanctions designation, and KSA confirmation of operation without a Dutch licence.
Timeline of Financial Harm
From Russian origin in 2007 to Dutch Supreme Court bankruptcy in 2023 and continuing operation via a Curaçao letterbox successor, 1xBet's trajectory tracks a consistent pattern of jurisdictional escalation and regulatory evasion.
Venture Timeline
Cumulative Financial Harm
Systematic Pattern
Documented pattern: serial venture launches followed by collapse, immediate rebranding, and withdrawal restrictions coinciding with recruitment slowdowns.
1xBet (Russia origin)
Active2007–2017
Origin — Russian Gambling Roots
Scheme Premise
Domestic Russian sportsbook aggressively expanding via affiliate marketing and pirated content distribution.
Collapse Signal
Alleged criminal proceedings by Russian authorities against co-founders prompted offshore relocation.
Regulatory Actions (1)
Alleged criminal proceedings against co-founders
1xBet Global (Curaçao)
Collapsed2014–2023
Offshore Relaunch — 1xCorp Era
Scheme Premise
Globally marketed sportsbook using Curaçao master licence to operate across 12+ jurisdictions.
Collapse Signal
Dutch Supreme Court finalised 1xCorp bankruptcy after claims from defrauded clients went unanswered.
Regulatory Actions (2)
Operating without licence
Bankruptcy finalised
Acom Latin America NV
Rebranded2023–Present
Letterbox Successor — Same Address, New Shell
Scheme Premise
Continued global gambling operations under a new corporate name at the same Curaçao address.
Collapse Signal
Active — continues operating despite sanctions and regulatory blacklists.
Regulatory Actions (1)
Placed on sanctions list
Crypto Gambling Channels
Active2019–Present
Cryptocurrency Laundering Infrastructure
Scheme Premise
Anonymised deposit/withdrawal rails bypassing banking KYC in regulated markets.
Collapse Signal
Ongoing — FTM cryptocurrency analysis identified 250+ wallets facilitating flows.
Regulatory Actions (1)
1,800+ blacklist entries
The Cycle Is Not Over
Latest scheme remains active. Zero successful prosecutions to date.
Russian Origin (2007–2017)
1xBet was founded in Russia in 2007 and grew rapidly through affiliate marketing and, according to Follow the Money reporting, illegal film-download distribution as a user-acquisition channel.
Subsequent reporting (Arbusers) indicates the co-founders became subjects of Russian criminal proceedings, prompting an offshore relocation and a strategic shift toward Curaçao-licensed operations.
Offshore Consolidation (2014–2019)
1xCorp N.V. in Curaçao was used as the parent vehicle for global 1xBet operations, leveraging Cyberluck's master licence. By 2018 the KSA had internally flagged 1xBet-style operators for non-compliance across at least 12 European jurisdictions and Australia.
Reputational Collapse (2019–2020)
A 2019 Sunday Times investigation documented links to a casino with topless dealers, illegal advertising and bets on children's sports, prompting Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham to end partnerships.
A 2020 Dutch government memo to State Secretary Raymond Knops warned that the Kingdom's reputation was at stake due to Curaçao gambling industry practices.
Enforcement Escalation (2023–Present)
In January 2023 the Dutch Supreme Court finalised 1xCorp's bankruptcy; Ukraine placed 1xBet and the Curaçao entities on a sanctions list the same year, identifying the Netherlands as the brand's home jurisdiction. Follow the Money's June 2023 investigation and subsequent Bellingcat, Protos and AGBrief reports (2024) have sustained enforcement and integrity pressure.
Reputation Engineering & Information Suppression
1xBet has systematically deployed elite sports sponsorships — including FC Barcelona, PSG, Serie A and La Liga — and celebrity endorsements to manufacture brand legitimacy in regulated markets where it reportedly does not hold valid operating licences.
This reputation strategy has been repeatedly undermined by investigative reporting: Premier League sponsorships terminated in 2019 following the Sunday Times exposé, and subsequent FTM, Bellingcat and Protos coverage has compounded reputational exposure.
Reputation Manipulation Timeline
Click any node to inspect evidence — 2020–2025
Information Ecosystem Pressure
Rather than formal DMCA abuse patterns observed in crypto Ponzi cases, 1xBet's response to adverse coverage has been characterised by non-engagement — no responses to bankruptcy claims, no substantive rebuttals to Follow the Money's June 2023 investigation, and continued operation via successor entities despite Ukrainian sanctions. This jurisdictional evasion strategy produces a de facto chilling effect on enforcement without requiring direct content suppression.
Lumen Database Notice #34628019
False DMCA ClaimEvidence of bad-faith copyright claim used to suppress investigative journalism
1xBet invests heavily in elite sports sponsorships and celebrity endorsements while operating without valid licences in multiple regulated markets.
Investigative Analysis
This pattern is characteristic of reputation-laundering via sports marketing — using the legitimacy of top-tier clubs to mask unlicensed operations.
Company markets Curaçao master licence as authorisation to operate globally, while the KSA (Netherlands) and Ukrainian sanctions authority identify the operations as unlicensed and sanctioned.
Investigative Analysis
CRITICAL: A Curaçao master licence does not authorise operation in EU, US or Australian regulated markets — the claim of legitimacy via such licensing is demonstrably misleading.
Investigative coverage (Sunday Times, FTM, Bellingcat, Protos, AGBrief) has steadily accumulated; no successful legal challenges by 1xBet to this reporting are documented.
Investigative Analysis
Absence of legal response to bankruptcy claims and investigative reporting suggests a strategy of jurisdictional evasion rather than rebuttal.
Source: Lumen Database (lumendatabase.org) - Public record of online content removal requests
Comparative Fraud Analysis: Structural Parallels
Although 1xBet is not a classic investment Ponzi, its structural playbook shares key features with OneCoin and BitConnect: offshore incorporation in opacity jurisdictions, founder-group control with family-like concentration, rebranding/successor entities following enforcement, and heavy reliance on cryptocurrency rails.
Where OneCoin collapsed within ~4 years and BitConnect within ~17 months, 1xBet has persisted for 16+ years — a durability driven by its plausible-seeming Curaçao master licence, elite sponsorship-driven legitimacy, and Ukraine/NL enforcement being geographically and politically fragmented.
| Scheme | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1xBet (Semiokhin) SUBJECTEXTREME RISK | |||||
OneCoin COMPARATOREXTREME RISK | |||||
BitConnect COMPARATORCRITICAL RISK |
Pattern Dimensions
5 / 5
Subject scheme assessed across all 5 fraud dimensions identified in historical comparators.
Corporate Rebranding
1xCorp → Acom Latin America
Key operational signature distinguishing this subject scheme from single-cycle historical comparators.
Comparator Schemes
2 analysed
Historical comparators: OneCoin, BitConnect.
“Independent investigations by Follow the Money, The Sunday Times, Bellingcat and Protos describe 1xBet as a globally distributed gambling operation exhibiting recurring structural red flags: a Russian origin with alleged state-level criminal exposure, a Curaçao master-licence veneer used to access regulated markets, successor-entity rebranding following bankruptcy, €4 billion in crypto flows traced across anonymised wallets, and documented allegations ranging from bets on children's sports to hosting manipulated amateur streams.”
Red Flag Catalog
Severity Distribution — 6 Red Flags Documented
1xBet reportedly targets 12+ regulated jurisdictions without valid local licences, relying on a Curaçao master licence.
Regulators including the Kansspelautoriteit (NL) have identified 1xBet as operating without authorisation; a Curaçao licence does not authorise cross-border operation in EU, US or Australian markets.
Documented Examples
- KSA memo (2018) cites non-compliance across 12+ jurisdictions
- Ukrainian sanctions list inclusion (2023)
- 1,800+ blacklist entries internationally
Kansspelautoriteit (KSA)
“1xBet has been identified as offering gambling services in the Netherlands without the required national licence.”
Ukraine placed 1xBet and its Curaçao entities on a sanctions list for alleged financial support of Russia.
Sanctions exposure creates cross-border AML and counterparty risk; Ukrainian designations identify the Netherlands as the operative home jurisdiction of the brand.
Documented Examples
- 2023 Ukrainian sanctions listing
- Co-founders reportedly wanted by Russian state (per Arbusers)
- Alleged golden-passport route into Cyprus
Acom Latin America NV appeared at the same Curaçao address after the Dutch Supreme Court finalised 1xCorp's bankruptcy.
Replacing a bankrupt parent with a same-address letterbox is a classic pattern for evading creditor claims while preserving operational continuity.
Documented Examples
- 1xCorp → Acom Latin America NV at same Willemstad address
- Defrauded clients unpaid across Argentina, NL, Africa
- No responses to bankruptcy claims
€4 billion in crypto transactions across 250+ wallets and 3M+ transactions linked to 1xBet (FTM analysis).
Extensive use of cryptocurrency channels bypasses banking KYC and complicates regulatory tracing in jurisdictions where gambling is restricted or illegal.
Documented Examples
- €4B aggregate flows traced
- 250+ wallets, 3M+ transactions
- €1M+ individual client loss reported by lawyer Bijkerk
Allegations range from bets on children's sports to hosting thousands of amateur streams raising match-fixing concerns.
Sunday Times, Bellingcat, Protos and AGBrief reporting link 1xBet to integrity-compromising practices harmful to consumers and to the sports ecosystem.
Documented Examples
- 2019 Sunday Times — topless dealers, child-sports bets
- 2024 Bellingcat — thousands of amateur streams
- 2024 AGBrief / Protos — alleged involvement in fake matches
1xBet reportedly used illegal Hollywood film downloads to attract users in India, previously deployed in Russia.
Using copyright infringement as a user acquisition funnel compounds legal exposure and indicates willingness to operate outside legal norms to build market share.
Documented Examples
- FTM 2023 — Hollywood piracy in India
- Prior Russian piracy marketing
- Integration with celebrity endorsement network
Final Risk Assessment
Overall Classification
Risk Assessment Scorecard
Risk Vector Overview
Scores based on documented findings. Max = 100.
AML Risk
SEVEREExtensive crypto flows through anonymised wallets, offshore letterbox rebranding, and sanctions exposure create severe AML red flags aligned with FATF/FinCEN typologies.
Crypto flows traced
€4B across 250+ wallets
Transactions analysed
3M+
Sanctions designations
Ukraine (2023)
Letterbox successor
Acom Latin America NV
AML Risk Classification: SEVERE. €4 billion in crypto flows across 250+ wallets, Ukrainian sanctions exposure, and a same-address letterbox successor to a bankrupt parent constitute a classic high-risk AML profile under FATF typologies.
Aggregate Financial Harm: Victims across Argentina, the Netherlands, Russia and African countries report unpaid claims; lawyer Roel Bijkerk documents individual losses exceeding €1 million in bitcoin alone.
Regulatory Evasion Pattern: 1xBet continues to operate despite 1,800+ blacklist entries, Dutch Supreme Court bankruptcy of its parent, Ukrainian sanctions, and KSA identification as unlicensed — indicating a persistent model of jurisdictional arbitrage rather than compliance.
Roman Semiokhin's profile as a co-founder of 1xBet places him at the centre of a long-running, multi-jurisdictional gambling operation with severe AML, reputational and legal risk exposure. The combination of sanctions, bankruptcy, crypto-scale flows, integrity allegations and successor-entity continuity warrants enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring for any counterparty with direct or indirect exposure to the 1xBet network.
Get Involved
Sign in to comment, reply and react
We moderate comments to keep this a respectful and safe place. We have a zero-tolerance approach to user-to-user personal abuse. Please follow the house rules.
COMMENT
Participate in discussion, add context, and respond to this report.
TIPS AND EVIDENCE
Submit verified tips, supporting evidence, or additional intelligence.
CORRECTIONS
Request factual corrections or submit verifiable updates for this report.
* This discussion is moderated. Keep comments factual, relevant, and constructive. All submissions are reviewed before publication.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!