Logo

Investigation

Gurhan Kiziloz

  • Nationality
  • Turkish
  • Label
  • Shell Network
  • Industry
  • Online Gambling
  • Role
  • CEO Founder
  • Known For
  • Nexus Group
A = 0-25Low riskB = 26-50medium riskC = 51-75high riskD = 76-100critical riskC61 / 100POINTSRISK INDEX

ⓘ Weighted Risk Indicators

High Risk Classification

OSINT Investigation:
Gurhan Kiziloz

Serial fintech and crypto venture operator linked to alleged unauthorized financial services, presale discrepancies, and reputation suppression

Primary Jurisdictions

United Kingdom, Cyprus, Estonia, Dubai

Investigation Period

2019 – Present

Methodology

Open-Source Intelligence

FintechCryptocurrencyFCA WarningShell CompaniesDMCA AbusePresale AllegationsSerial Rebranding
Scroll to explore

Intelligence Metrics

70+

Sources Analyzed

Investigative journalism, FCA records, Companies House filings, on-chain analysis

11

Specific Allegations

FCA warning, presale discrepancies, DMCA abuse, fund diversion claims

5

Jurisdictions

United Kingdom, Cyprus, Estonia, UAE, Seychelles

7

Linked Entities

Lanistar, Nexus International (EE/CY), DAG Systems, WPRO, MegaPosta, Spartans.com

4

Court Proceedings

Employment tribunals and winding-up petitions in UK courts

68/100

Risk Index Score

High Risk classification per investigative report

Investigation Snapshot

Gurhan Kiziloz is a British-Turkish entrepreneur (b. 1987) and founder of UK fintech Lanistar, currently chairman of Nexus International. Open-source intelligence links him to a sequence of ventures characterised by a 2020 FCA consumer warning, multiple UK court proceedings culminating in compulsory liquidation of Lanistar in April 2025, on-chain contradictions of BlockDAG presale claims, alleged DMCA-based reputation suppression, and a rapid post-collapse pivot into Estonia and Cyprus successor entities. He carries a 68/100 'High Risk' index score with operations spanning the UK, Estonia, Cyprus, UAE and Seychelles.

Identity & Corporate Network Analysis

Identity Verification

Gurhan Kiziloz, born August 1987, holds British-Turkish nationality with a professional background reportedly in sales training and education at Middlesex University (unverified). His public footprint is highly asymmetric: a LinkedIn presence with 2,000+ followers, a sparsely active X/Twitter account (@Gkiziloz, 9 followers), and Instagram content focused on lifestyle imagery — alongside self-reported claims of a $1.7B personal net worth that lack any third-party verification.

He holds no verified personal regulatory licenses across the financial-services jurisdictions in which his entities operate. Investigative reporting attaches a 68/100 risk index score and 'Red Flagged' classification, with primary jurisdictions of operation identified as the United Kingdom and Dubai.

Corporate Network Mapping

The corporate network's UK anchor is Lanistar Limited (Co. #12091938), incorporated July 2019 at 361 King Street, London W6 9NA. Kiziloz was appointed director in October 2020, coinciding with Gursel Niyazi's transition from majority owner — a relationship reportedly undisclosed as family-linked in initial filings despite a 25–50% shareholding.

Following Lanistar's regulatory and operational decline, Kiziloz incorporated Nexus International Entertainment OÜ in Estonia in May 2024 (Co. #16992162) as 100% beneficial owner, followed by Nexus Entertainment Ltd in Cyprus on April 23, 2025 (Co. #ΗΕ 474287) — three weeks after Lanistar's compulsory liquidation order. Affiliated brands MegaPosta and Spartans.com sit within the Estonian stack, while Seychelles-incorporated DAG Systems Ltd is alleged to operate BlockDAG, and UK-linked WPRO is alleged to be directed by Kiziloz without formal title.

Corporate Network

Entity Web — 10 Entities, 10 Relationships

Click any node to inspect · Drag to pan · Scroll to zoom · Edge colors: owns · manages · rebranded · affiliated

UK
Cyprus
Estonia
Seychelles
Status
active
collapsed
rebranded
flagged
Node size = connection count

Beneficial Ownership & Control Analysis

UBO / Principals
Offshore Structures
Operational Entities
Schemes
KizilozUK / DubaiNiyazi (family)United KingdomSeychellesSeychellesEstoniaEstoniaCyprusCyprusUKUnited KingdomNexusMulti-jurisdictionalBlockDAGSeychelles/MultiBIGMulti
Entities:UBOOffshoreOperationalScheme
Risk:HighMedium

Click on nodes or connection lines to reveal concealment tactics and red flags

The network exhibits classic offshore concealment patterns: a Seychelles entity (DAG Systems Ltd) housing alleged BlockDAG operations, an Estonia stack providing EU access while substituting for collapsed UK structures, and a Cyprus vehicle incorporated immediately post-liquidation to extend operational continuity beyond the reach of UK insolvency proceedings.

Family-linked shareholdings represent a separate concealment layer. Gursel Niyazi's 25–50% Lanistar stake was reportedly undisclosed as a family relationship in initial Companies House filings, with Niyazi later transitioning from majority owner as Kiziloz formally took the director seat in October 2020 — a structure that obscured ultimate control during the FCA-warning period.

AML Jurisdiction Risk Map0 Critical · 3 High Risk
Click a highlighted country to explore
Critical Risk
High Risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
No Activity
Jurisdictions Tracked5
Regulatory Actions2
AML Flag Indicators15
Critical Jurisdictions0

Systemic AML red flags include: alleged Middle Eastern OTC broker routing in connection with BlockDAG presale flows, post-collapse cross-border incorporations, undisclosed family ownership at the UK entity level, and a self-reported $1.2B 2025 Nexus revenue figure with no audited basis. Together these indicators justify elevated AML scrutiny across all five jurisdictions of operation.

Timeline of Financial Harm

From 2019 incorporation of Lanistar to the April 2025 compulsory liquidation and parallel Cyprus incorporation, the timeline traces an arc from regulated UK fintech ambition to multi-jurisdictional successor structures shadowed by FCA scrutiny, on-chain controversy, and litigation.

4
Ventures
Alleged $330M+ discrepancy
Est. Total Losses
2+
Regulatory Actions
Total Victims

Venture Timeline

Cumulative Financial Harm

Lanistar
Big Eyes Coin
BlockDAG
Nexus International
Estimated Losses

Systematic Pattern

Documented pattern: serial venture launches followed by collapse, immediate rebranding, and withdrawal restrictions coinciding with recruitment slowdowns.

Lanistar

Collapsed

2019–2025

Genesis — The Fintech Promise

Scheme Premise

UK fintech offering 'revolutionary payment security' and a polymorphic debit card marketed as the 'world's most secure card'.

Collapse Signal

FCA consumer warning (2020) for unauthorized financial services; multiple winding-up petitions; compulsory liquidation April 2025.

Regulatory Actions (2)

FCAUnited Kingdom·Nov 2020

Consumer warning (later removed)

ASAUnited Kingdom·2021

Advertising standards review

Rebranded as Big Eyes Coin

Big Eyes Coin

Collapsed

2023

BIG

Meme-Token Presale & Rapid Collapse

Scheme Premise

Cat-themed meme token marketed via aggressive presale campaigns promising community-driven returns.

$40M+ presale; 99% value collapseEst. Losses
Documented investor testimonials (UK, Brazil)Victims

Collapse Signal

Token lost 99% of value within days of June 15, 2023 launch; some investors reported tokens never delivered.

Rebranded as BlockDAG

BlockDAG

Collapsed

2024

BDAG

Presale Discrepancy & On-Chain Contradictions

Scheme Premise

Layer-1 presale claiming $433M raised across global roadshows.

Alleged $330M+ discrepancyEst. Losses
Presale participantsVictims

Collapse Signal

ZachXBT on-chain analysis cited sub-$100M actual receipts versus the $433M marketed figure; alleged Seychelles routing via DAG Systems Ltd.

Rebranded as Nexus International

Nexus International

Rebranded

2024–Present

Post-Lanistar Pivot — Entertainment & Gaming Umbrella

Scheme Premise

Entertainment/gaming-affiliate group claiming $1.2B 2025 revenue (self-reported), spanning MegaPosta and Spartans.com brands.

Collapse Signal

The Cycle Is Not Over

Latest scheme remains active. Zero successful prosecutions to date.

Lanistar Genesis (2019–2020)

Lanistar Limited was incorporated in July 2019 as a UK fintech promising 'revolutionary payment security'. A 2020 Forbes article cited a $189M pre-launch valuation that investigative analysts subsequently characterised as advertorial in nature with no independent verification.

On November 18, 2020 the UK FCA issued a consumer warning that the firm appeared to be providing financial services without authorization. The warning was removed two days later on November 20, 2020 following a compliance agreement, but remains a permanent regulatory record.

Litigation and Crypto Adjacencies (2021–2023)

Through 2021 Lanistar faced employment tribunal proceedings, including Miss C Finch v Lanistar (Case 1402374/2021) and Ms R Culcay and others v Lanistar (Case 2203543/2021), both ultimately settled. In June 2023 Big Eyes Coin launched following a $40M+ presale and lost 99% of its value within days, with documented investor testimonials including a £2,494 loss (Simon, UK) and a $500 loss for tokens never received (Edson Silva, Brazil).

BlockDAG and the Nexus Pivot (2024)

ZachXBT analysis in 2024 contradicted BlockDAG's $433M presale claim, citing on-chain receipts of under $100M and alleging fund routing via Middle Eastern OTC brokers and Seychelles-incorporated DAG Systems Ltd. In May 2024 Kiziloz incorporated Nexus International Entertainment OÜ in Estonia as 100% UBO, signalling the operational pivot from the UK fintech identity.

September 2024 saw the dismissal of a winding-up petition by 361 Hammersmith Ltd against Lanistar following debt settlement — a reprieve that proved temporary.

Compulsory Liquidation and Continuity (2025)

On February 17, 2025 Accomplish Financial Limited filed a winding-up petition that resulted in a compulsory liquidation order; on April 2, 2025 Lanistar was placed into compulsory liquidation with the Official Receiver appointed. Three weeks later, on April 23, 2025, Nexus Entertainment Ltd was incorporated in Cyprus, ensuring continuity of the operator's commercial activity beyond the UK collapse.

Reputation Engineering & Information Suppression

Public-domain evidence indicates a sustained reputation-management strategy combining unverifiable wealth claims ($1.7B net worth, $1.2B Nexus revenue, $189M Forbes valuation) with allegations of paid Glassdoor reviews and suppressed negative employee feedback during the Lanistar period.

The subject's positioning across LinkedIn, lifestyle Instagram content, and curated press coverage projects the persona of a successful fintech and entertainment-group entrepreneur — a narrative materially undermined by the FCA consumer warning, compulsory liquidation, and the BlockDAG on-chain discrepancies cited by ZachXBT.

Reputation Manipulation Timeline

Click any node to inspect evidence — 2020–2025

Manufactured Authority — crafted PR & persona building
Information Suppression — DMCA, legal threats, erasure
Manufactured Authority
Information Suppression
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Forbes Valuation
Glassdoor Scheme
Net Worth Claim
DMCA Abuse
Interpol Claim
Authority Events
3 documented persona-building episodes
Suppression Events
2 documented censorship incidents — DMCA abuse, legal threats, SEO manipulation
Pattern
Every major PR push is paired within months by a suppression action, erasing counter-narrative

Documented Censorship Campaigns

Investigative reporting by Financial News London, corroborated by Lumen Database notices, documents allegedly fraudulent DMCA takedown filings via fake entities 'uj22.com' and 'Perrier & Associates' targeting critical coverage. The pattern — fabricated copyright claims used to remove investigative reporting — is consistent with reputation-laundering strategies seen in other serial venture operators and produces a chilling effect on follow-up coverage.

Lumen Database Notice #34628019

False DMCA Claim

Evidence of bad-faith copyright claim used to suppress investigative journalism

DMCA takedown notices reportedly filed against critical investigative coverage of Lanistar and associated ventures, attributed to entities 'uj22.com' and 'Perrier & Associates'.

Investigative Analysis

These DMCA notices target investigative reporting concerning FCA actions, BlockDAG presale discrepancies, and corporate network mapping.

Filers assert prior copyright ownership over content originally produced by independent investigative journalists.

Investigative Analysis

CRITICAL: Financial News London and Lumen Database evidence cited in investigative coverage indicates these claims appear fabricated, with no verifiable corporate footprint for the claiming entities.

Multiple takedown attempts targeting different outlets covering FCA warning, employment tribunals, and on-chain BlockDAG analysis.

Investigative Analysis

The pattern is consistent with reputation-laundering tactics observed in serial venture operators.

Critical Evidence
Supporting Detail
Context

Source: Lumen Database (lumendatabase.org) - Public record of online content removal requests

Comparative Fraud Analysis: Structural Parallels

Compared to OneCoin and BitConnect — two of the most thoroughly documented crypto-era fraud archetypes — the Kiziloz network shares specific structural features rather than identical mechanics: heavy reliance on offshore jurisdictions (Seychelles, Estonia, Cyprus), family or affiliate concealment layers, marketing of unverifiable financial figures, and rapid pivots when one venture loses momentum. The differentiator is the diversified-venture model: rather than a single instrument promising fixed yields, the network spans fintech (Lanistar), meme tokens (Big Eyes), Layer-1 presale (BlockDAG), and entertainment-affiliate gaming (Nexus, MegaPosta, Spartans.com).

The rebrand lifecycle mirrors classic patterns: regulatory pressure or operational collapse on the legacy entity (FCA warning → litigation → liquidation) is met with successor-jurisdiction incorporations rather than wind-down. Estonia (May 2024) and Cyprus (April 2025) successor incorporations bracket the Lanistar collapse on either side, ensuring uninterrupted commercial continuity for the operator.

Severity scale:EXTREMEHIGHMEDLOW
Scheme
Kiziloz Network
SUBJECT
HIGH RISK
OneCoin
COMPARATOR
EXTREME RISK
BitConnect
COMPARATOR
CRITICAL RISK

Pattern Dimensions

5 / 5

Subject scheme assessed across all 5 fraud dimensions identified in historical comparators.

Rebranding Frequency

Lanistar → Nexus pivot

Key operational signature distinguishing this subject scheme from single-cycle historical comparators.

Comparator Schemes

2 analysed

Historical comparators: OneCoin, BitConnect.

Open-source intelligence identifies Gurhan Kiziloz as the central figure across a sequence of high-profile UK fintech and crypto ventures characterised by FCA scrutiny, presale figure discrepancies contradicted by on-chain analysis, undisclosed family-linked ownership, alleged DMCA-based reputation suppression, and serial pivots from collapsed UK structures into successive Estonia and Cyprus vehicles.

Red Flag Catalog

Severity Distribution — 6 Red Flags Documented

2 Critical
2 Severe
2 High

UK FCA issued a consumer warning against Lanistar in November 2020 for providing financial services without authorization.

Operating regulated activities without authorization is a foundational AML and consumer-protection red flag. Although the warning was removed two days later following a compliance agreement, it remains a permanent record of unauthorized activity.

Documented Examples

  • FCA consumer warning Nov 18, 2020
  • Warning removed Nov 20, 2020 following compliance agreement
  • Subsequent ASA scrutiny over 'world's most secure card' marketing

UK Financial Conduct Authority

We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation.

BlockDAG's $433M presale claim is alleged to contradict on-chain receipts of under $100M per ZachXBT analysis.

Material discrepancies between marketed presale totals and on-chain receipts represent a core securities and consumer-protection red flag, raising potential misrepresentation concerns.

Documented Examples

  • BlockDAG marketed $433M vs alleged sub-$100M on-chain
  • DAG Systems Ltd Seychelles entity cited as operational vehicle
  • Alleged Middle Eastern OTC broker fund routing

Pivot from collapsed Lanistar into Estonia and Cyprus Nexus vehicles within months of liquidation.

Rapid post-collapse incorporation of EU-jurisdiction successor entities is a recognised pattern enabling continuity of activity beyond the reach of UK insolvency processes.

Documented Examples

  • Nexus OÜ incorporated May 2024 (Estonia)
  • Nexus Entertainment Ltd incorporated April 23, 2025 — three weeks after Lanistar liquidation
  • MegaPosta and Spartans.com affiliate brands within Nexus group

Gursel Niyazi held 25–50% of Lanistar with family relationship reportedly undisclosed in initial filings.

Undisclosed beneficial relationships at incorporation undermine Companies House transparency and constitute a structural AML red flag, particularly when paired with later director transitions.

Documented Examples

  • Niyazi held 25–50% Lanistar shares
  • Family relationship reportedly undisclosed in initial filings
  • Niyazi transitioned from majority owner October 2020 as Kiziloz appointed director

Allegedly fraudulent DMCA takedowns filed via fake entities 'uj22.com' and 'Perrier & Associates' targeting critical coverage.

Use of fabricated copyright claims to suppress investigative journalism is a recognised reputation-laundering tactic and indicates active concealment of public-interest information.

Documented Examples

  • DMCA notices via 'uj22.com'
  • DMCA notices via 'Perrier & Associates'
  • Lumen Database and Financial News London evidence cited
  • Glassdoor positive-review payment allegations

Self-reported $1.7B net worth and $1.2B 2025 Nexus revenue lack any independent third-party verification.

Marketing prominent unverifiable financial figures is a frequent precursor to investor solicitation and reputation building; absence of audited statements compounds the concern.

Documented Examples

  • $1.7B net worth claim (social media)
  • $1.2B Nexus 2025 revenue (press releases)
  • $189M Lanistar valuation (Forbes 2020 — advertorial characteristics noted)

Final Risk Assessment

Overall Classification

Risk Assessment Scorecard

2 (uj22.com, Perrier & Associates)
$1.7B net worth, $1.2B revenue, $189M valuation
Paid positive reviews / suppressed negatives
SEVERE

Risk Vector Overview

Scores based on documented findings. Max = 100.

AML Risk

HIGH

Multi-jurisdictional offshore stack, undisclosed family-linked ownership, and alleged Middle Eastern OTC routing generate material AML exposure.

Offshore jurisdictions used

5 (UK, Estonia, Cyprus, UAE, Seychelles)

Undisclosed shareholding

Niyazi 25–50% (alleged family link)

Alleged fund routing

Middle Eastern OTC brokers (BlockDAG)

Post-collapse incorporations

Nexus EE (2024), Nexus CY (2025)

AML Risk Classification: HIGH. A five-jurisdiction footprint (UK, Estonia, Cyprus, UAE, Seychelles), undisclosed family-linked Lanistar shareholding (Niyazi 25–50%), alleged Middle Eastern OTC routing of BlockDAG presale flows, and successive post-collapse EU incorporations satisfy multiple FATF/FinCEN red-flag categories.

Aggregate Public Harm Indicators: Documented Big Eyes Coin investor testimonials (£2,494; $500), a $433M-vs-sub-$100M BlockDAG figure gap per ZachXBT, four UK court proceedings against Lanistar, and a compulsory liquidation order issued April 2, 2025.

Regulatory & Reputation Pattern: FCA consumer warning (2020), ASA scrutiny (2021), compulsory liquidation (2025), allegedly fraudulent DMCA filings via 'uj22.com' and 'Perrier & Associates', and unverified $1.7B net worth and $1.2B revenue figures collectively indicate a sustained pattern of regulatory friction and reputation engineering.

Entity Lifecycle Network

Regulatory evasion pattern · 2020 – 2025

2020
Year
1
Active
0
Collapsed
1
Regulatory Actions
2020Gurhan KizilozLanistar Limited
202020212022202320242025
Active entity
Collapsed entity
Operator
Regulatory action
Rebrand / migration
Control
Enforcement

Synthesising the available evidence, Gurhan Kiziloz warrants a High Risk classification (68/100) with active monitoring of the Estonia and Cyprus Nexus structures, ongoing BlockDAG developments, and any further UK enforcement actions arising from the Lanistar Official Receiver's investigation. All findings rely on open-source materials and should be treated as allegations and indicators rather than judicial determinations.

OSINT Investigation Report

Investigation Period: 2020 – Present

Methodology: Open-Source Intelligence

Risk Index

* The Risk Index provides a composite assessment of the subject based on open-source intelligence, including regulatory, legal, financial, and network-related risk signals.

Shell Network

VERDICT: The risk pattern reflects categories including financial regulatory scrutiny, alleged consumer protection concerns, governance and corporate transparency questions, and reputational issues stemming from media coverage. These compliance signals span fintech regulation, advertising standards, and cross-border business activities.

Risk Score
Index

61/100

Based on reviewed reviews & documented sources

High Risk

Gurhan Kiziloz is reportedly linked to Lanistar, a fintech firm that received a public warning from the UK's Financial Conduct Authority for allegedly offering financial services without authorisation.

8/10

Moderate Risk

Kiziloz's company Lanistar is alleged to have engaged in aggressive influencer marketing campaigns that drew scrutiny from financial regulators and consumer protection bodies.

6/10

Moderate Risk

Kiziloz is reported to have been associated with companies that experienced significant financial losses and operational restructuring, raising questions about corporate governance.

6/10

Moderate Risk

Kiziloz is alleged to have made ambitious public valuation claims about his ventures that were questioned by industry analysts and financial journalists.

5/10

High Risk

Companies linked to Kiziloz have reportedly come under scrutiny regarding compliance with UK anti-money laundering and consumer protection regulations.

7/10

Moderate Risk

Kiziloz is reported to have ventures in the online gaming and gambling sector, an industry subject to heightened regulatory and licensing requirements across jurisdictions.

6/10

Moderate Risk

Public filings linked to Kiziloz's businesses have reportedly shown irregularities in reporting timelines and director appointments at Companies House.

5/10

High Risk

Kiziloz's promotional strategies for fintech products were alleged to have misled consumers regarding the readiness and licensing status of financial services offered.

7/10

Moderate Risk

Entities associated with Kiziloz have reportedly faced reputational scrutiny in mainstream financial press regarding their operational and compliance frameworks.

5/10

Moderate Risk

Kiziloz is under scrutiny in OSINT and compliance reporting for cross-border business activities that may involve elevated due diligence requirements.

6/10

* Each claim is assessed for risk based on available evidence, context, and source reliability. Scores reflect relative severity, not definitive conclusions.

Photo Editing

Structure & Design

Fact Checking

  • BOOKMARKED
  • 4
  • VIEWS
  • 10k
  • ENGAGEMENTS
  • 4
  • REPORT AGE
  • 1 month old
  • ENTITY
  • 3

Verification Snapshot

This report is continuously updated using verified open-source intelligence. All additions and revisions undergo review before inclusion.

ANONYMOUS TIPS

3

Anonymous inputs from users

CORRECTIONS

1

Verified updates applied to this report

PUBLISHED DATE

Apr 29, 2026

Initial publication timestamp

LAST MODIFIED

Jun 15, 2026

Latest verified update applied

Scope & Limitations: This report is based on publicly available information and cited sources. It does not constitute a determination of wrongdoing. Corrections must be supported by verifiable documentation.

Have credible information, documentation, or source material relevant to a high-risk entity?

  • AML Report
  • ADVERSE MEDIA

Javier Loya

Javier Loya faced felony sexual assault charges, entered an Alford plea to a misdemeanor, and received an indefinite NFL suspension with a $500K fine for conduct violations.

Role

Co-founder, OTC Global Holdings; Minority Shareholder

Jurisdictions

United States (Kentucky, Texas)

Period

2002–2025

Classification

High Risk

  • AML Report
  • HIGH RISK

Jean Claude Bastos De Morais

Examining reported conflicts of interest, alleged embezzlement, and Swiss criminal history linked to Quantum Global's management of Angola's sovereign wealth assets.

Nationality

Angolan Swiss

Industry

Finance Investment

Known For

Money Laundering

Key Event

Corruption Allegations, Paradise Papers

  • Due Diligence
  • HIGH RISK

Jeffrey Werdesheim

FINRA records show a $940K arbitration claim, a $125K settlement, and a pattern of alleged unsuitable recommendations spanning two decades against Werdesheim.

Risk Level

HIGH

Jurisdictions

California, USA

Period

2003 – 2025

Client Disputes

4

  • AML Report
  • HIGH RISK

Jose Luis Ycaza

Investigators examined Ycaza's ties to Florida LLCs and Quintessa Enterprises amid scrutiny of corporate structures linked to the Pólit offshore network.

Role

Private banker / Civil Litigation Defendant

Jurisdictions

United States (Florida), Ecuador

Period

2018–2025

Classification

High Risk

  • AML Report
  • HIGH RISK

Canaima Finance Ltd

Portuguese prosecutors allege Canaima Finance received €47M in bribe-linked payments tied to BES and Venezuelan officials, with a reported $12M transfer now under investigation.

Risk Level

CRITICAL

Jurisdictions

British Virgin Islands • Venezuela • Portugal

Period

2010 – 2024

Linked Entities

12

  • Deep Dive
  • HIGH RISK

Eric Spofford

Eric Spofford faces federal stalking charges and prior misconduct allegations. Examining reported settlements, a dismissed defamation suit, and escalating legal exposure.

Industry

Healthcare

Role

Entrepreneur

Jurisdiction

New Hampshire

Known For

Granite Recovery Centers

Receive verified investigative reports on corruption, financial crime, and high-risk entities.

No noise. No recycled headlines. Just evidence-backed intelligence.

Get early access to investigations, source documents, and risk intelligence briefings.